Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chirayu Amin
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 03:57, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- Chirayu Amin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete - This article is not notable. PradeepChowdhury (talk) 20:20, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep; retaliatory nomination for deletion of A. Chawla and Ayaan Chawla. Nominator is the subject of an SPI. The argument for deletion is WP:JNN, even though the article has three RS that are about this person and he has held executive offices in cricket that I believe combine to meet the notability threshold. —KuyaBriBriTalk 00:15, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep; I do concur with @Kuyabribri and there is no explicit reason for nomination by nominator. Possibly this nomination could be a ourburst/frustration of repeated deletion of articles regarding Ayaan Chawla by the nominator. Apart from the sources present in Chirayu Amin article, there do exist third party sources over a google search. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ)(Support) 15:21, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.