Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chimpcam
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
(Non-admin-closure). The result was keep. Nominator withdrew and no delete votes are present.The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 19:17, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Chimpcam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete. This has one article that uses "Chimpcam" once. One article is the source and that confirms a show called chimcam will be aired. Appears to by WP:SYN, and Non notable. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:36, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose deletion The source is the BBC. Can you name a better, more reliable source? Grundle2600 (talk) 16:38, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- An outside one. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:49, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Here's a non BBC source[1]. I'd think the article probably should be moved to The Chimpcam Project which appears to be the actual program name. But it appears to be a notable documentary. I not seeing a reason to delete.--Cube lurker (talk) 16:57, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for the link. I have moved the article. Grundle2600 (talk) 17:00, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Fine by me. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 17:29, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The project is an one of a kind experimental study which needs expansion. Since the result/movie will be aired in two days , days before the AFD is decided, I'm certain it does and will meet WP's notability guidelines with ease [and being some kind of a chimp myself I just know it will surpass editors expectations. Please don't offend my people by deleting. Thanks.] --The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 18:12, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.