Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chief Examiner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Questprobe. Vanamonde (Talk) 11:53, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chief Examiner

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Comics character. Fails WP:N, WP:NOTPLOT. The articles cites no in-depth third party coverage, and the article ist almost only plot summary, except for an anecdote about game designer Scott Adams, which can't be the basis for an article. Sandstein 15:35, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Sandstein 15:35, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Obscure fictional character that has virtually no significant coverage in reliable sources. I might be fine with a very light merge and Redirect to Questprobe, mainly to add that one sentence of possibly reliably sourced information on the character being modeled after Scott Adams, but that's about the extent of any WP:ATD I would recommend. And even if that occurs, the title of the redirect should be changed to something like Chief Examiner (fictional character), as the term "Chief Examiner" is used for many other things than this non-notable character. Even here on Wikipedia, the current title would be more useful as a Redirect to Office of Chief Examiner, for example. Rorshacma (talk) 16:50, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Questprobe as suggested above, per WP:ATD and WP:PRESERVE. BOZ (talk) 20:14, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article fails WP:NPLOT and WP:IN-U, and the topic lacks enough sourcing to satisfy WP:GNG. Seems like too broad a search term for time to be spent discussing its usefulness as a redirect here, though it can be recreated afterwards and discussed at RfD. Avilich (talk) 19:32, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's easy to find coverage in sources such as The Avengers in Videogames and Guinness World Records. The worst case would be merger to Questprobe per policies including WP:ATD and WP:PRESERVE. Andrew🐉(talk) 18:06, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.