Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicken Shops

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:42, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chicken Shops

~~Most of this content was copied from Chicken shop which was just deleted. G4 declined by PeterSymonds.~~ Original research, unlikely to be sourced. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 23:48, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment For the record, I've now seen three admins, off wiki, say that the deleted content was not an exact copy. No comment on this article just yet. Syn 23:53, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a neologism and dictionary definition. If it can be referenced, maybe consider for wictionary. Cheers, This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 23:56, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
G4 decline was correct, article is in no way related to the previously deleted article, subject is broadly related and title is similar but that's as close as it gets. Nick (talk) 00:12, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Did somebody say WP:OR? Where are the references? Vicenarian ^{(T · C)} 00:16, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am currently searching for references, I found one according to the comment on the page. Other than that, third party references seem a little difficult to find. Antonio López ^(desu) 00:22, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I take that back, that one reference I found is bad. Antonio López ^(desu) 00:30, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, have looked for 3rd party references and have not been able to find any reliable sources for this term. A new name 2008 (talk) 17:31, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nonverifiable notability of the expression. Mukadderat (talk) 05:25, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.