Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChicagoPride.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (WP:NAC) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:02, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ChicagoPride.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. Reads more like corporate PR than a neutral, informative article about a notable topic. Drm310 (talk) 18:31, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep see Google books results above.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:04, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:24, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:24, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:24, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, good coverage in books, above, — Cirt (talk) 04:24, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Cirt, WP:WEB, and Gene. Really, it's odd, because it's quite promotional, yet it leaves out a lot that touts the website. Bearian (talk) 18:51, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.