Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChessManiac.com
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Notability j⚛e deckertalk 18:50, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- ChessManiac.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article tagged for lack of notability since April 2011. Doesn't indicate the significance of the subject and is written like advertisement. Delete per WP:WEB. Forgot to put name (talk) 15:52, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Practically all of the article comes from one editor who hasn't edited anything else. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 20:33, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article's sources are from Chessmaniac.com itself, Facebook/Linkedin (??) and Alexa (???). In other words, no legitimate sources. --SubSeven (talk) 20:43, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - After source searching, it appears that only passing mentions are available. Appears to fail WP:N. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:41, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - this article does little more than describe the features on the website without showing a broader sense of notability. As per Wikipedia:Notability (web), this isn't enough. Against the current (talk) 15:28, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:13, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:13, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.