Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChefMoz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to DMOZ. (non-admin closure) CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:37, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ChefMoz

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage. Trivial coverage exists, especially in Google Books. Fails WP:WEB. SL93 (talk) 20:24, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:29, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:31, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - ChefMoz gained a little visibility in RSes because it was one of the early large-scale databases to publish their data in a semantic web-friendly RDF dump; see GSchol hits for 'ChefMoz'. — Charles Stewart (talk) 09:25, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to DMOZ. I think there might be enough RSes to be found to sustain an article passing the GNG, per my comment above, but because ChefMoz is so closely associated with DMOZ, there is no reason why SUCH content growth could not occur within that article. — Charles Stewart (talk) 09:25, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:20, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Chalst - this site doesn't meet our requirements for an article of its own, but it would be a useful and informative addition to the 'parent' DMOZ article. ◦ Trey Maturin 19:12, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.