Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheeki Breeki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Materialscientist (talk) 23:03, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cheeki Breeki

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTDICT and also unsourced. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 17:35, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The page is so poorly written that it is nearly incomprehensible. It appears to be some kind of game (recently made up, perhaps) or a non-English phrase or both. In any case, WP:GNG is not met. Peacock (talk) 17:38, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Contested deletion. Non-notable meme; complete WP:TRIVIA. Wikipedia is WP:NOTDIRECTORY or WP:GUIDE. No persitent or in-depth coverage in reliable sources: [1], [2] being the occasional mention only. — fortunavelut luna 17:41, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per not dictionary, and the article lacks content anyways. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. 🖉←} 17:46, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete just yet more badly written gamercruft. PROD or CSD would apply equally well, but as we're here, we're here. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:24, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.