Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Character Deaths
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was SPEEDILY DELETED AS G4. This is just X-men (deaths) and Heroes Deaths recreated as one article. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire - past ops) 12:48, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Character Deaths (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This topic is way too vague. It could literally encompass hundreds of thousands of works of fiction. As it is now, it appears to only contain the author's favorite works based on vague "criteria" that could apply to thousands of other works as well. Further, this is being set up more like an information page for fans, as opposed to an actual encyclopedia article. I also feel this falls in the criteria of Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. 132 19:28, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Pure plot summary, presented in a fashion that isn't useful in understanding the works in question. Agree that WP:IINFO applies here. JulesH (talk) 20:56, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete beyond the scope of this encyclopedia. Should engage in editing wookiepedia or the others. Also WP:IINFO does apply.--DFS454 (talk) 21:08, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Doesn't seem to fit with the style or categorization/list schemes in the rest of wikipedia. Cazort (talk) 21:49, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, but.... this would be a good addition to the different entertainment wikis on www.wikia.com, and I encourage the author to check those out, since there are widely-viewed Wikias for Star Wars (Wookieepedia), Star Trek (Memory Alpha), X-Men, Heroes and Lost ("Lostpedia") Mandsford (talk) 21:50, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. All of this information does not need to be in the same place. Macarion (talk) 01:43, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- fancruft. This is an indiscriminate collection of trivia that belongs somewhere more fandom-oriented, but not a serious encyclopedia. Reyk YO! 06:33, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I normally don't agree when something is nominated as an indiscriminate collection of facts. This time I do. This is exactly what the guideline was written for. This is a list that doesn't have solid inclusion criteria. If it did it has no potential to ever cover a reasonable amount of character deaths without becoming unwieldy and impossible to maintain. - Mgm|(talk) 11:06, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete meaningless topic Chzz ► 16:49, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all the above. I remember !voting in two very similar AFDs recently where somebody just listed the deaths of characters in X-Men and Heroes. Perhaps someone more patient than myself should explain the relevant policies to this guy. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 07:29, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Indiscriminate list.--Sloane (talk) 02:19, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.