Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Channelflip

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-admin). WP:PROBLEMS with article continent are irrelevant to the suitability for inclusion of topics.Skomorokh 19:35, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Channelflip

I declined the speedy on this one due to the links provided that show some third-party coverage. It's becoming clear that this is a self-made article, however, as I removed a lot of promotional stuff - "our company", a list of employees, etc. As I try to clean it up, I'm having doubts about the notability and the spaminess of the article. Tan | 39 14:31, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The page was deleted so I rewrote the entire thing, there is very little text on the page so it's hardly promotional at all. I don't work for the company either, I just watch there shows. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GrantBell (talk • contribs) 14:33, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep coverage from The Times, The Independent, and Wired is pretty solid. In addition to the WP:RS, a google search shows there's plenty of coverage in unreliable sources, which while not useable in wikipedia, does help push it over the edge for me in terms of notability. Vickser (talk) 16:04, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing promotional about the site on the wiki entry, and everything on the page can be gathered from there site. The statistics I did reference but that got removed for some stupid reason !!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by GrantBell (talk • contribs) 19:58, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I just scrubbed up the article's text. Admittedly, the original text had problems. But WP:RS is not an issue, and I wish the article's author provided links to Leo Laporte's coverage (which was cut in a previous edit).Ecoleetage (talk) 22:50, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 19:14, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.