Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Change management auditing
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 05:27, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Change management auditing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable buzzword phrase with no citations. Searching on Google Scholar brings up lots of "...change management, auditing..." and "...change management: auditing..." but no use as a phrase in itself. There's one or two passing mentions on Google Books. I can't find any mention in newspapers and there's scant sources on the web: what exists certainly isn't anything close to reliable source. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:39, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep/merge See sources such as Auditing Technology Change Processes or Audit Involvement. Warden (talk) 23:08, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:36, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- very weak Keep Much to my surprise , the The Internal Auditing Handbook ref seems to show it to be a distinct topic. It would need considerable rewriting. DGG ( talk ) 03:12, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.