Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandan Dasgupta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:34, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chandan Dasgupta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Please add any known source of third party recognition Shrikanthv (talk) 07:52, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In view of the recently added reference from the University Grants Commission website, I propose to remove the "delete" tag. Pranabnlp (talk) 10:56, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:34, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:34, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:34, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Above mentioned award only seems minor and not enough to establish notability. However, GScholar shows several highly cited publications, sufficient to meet WP:ACADEMIC#1. --Randykitty (talk) 14:37, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A GS h-index of around 30 gives a clear pass of WP:Prof#C1 in this moderately cited field. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:05, 10 March 2014 (UTC).[reply]

I request the admins to do a rethink on the "delete" tag. Pranabnlp (talk) 15:32, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:45, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Xxanthippe and Randykitty reasoning.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 14:30, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.