Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChameleonJohn.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 21:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ChameleonJohn.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a one year old website. There are sources, but they seem to be almost entirely advertorials and PR content written by employees of company. Fails WP:WEBCRIT. - Mr X 12:36, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:13, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:13, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:13, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:13, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I see no better improvement here and the best my searches found were this and this. SwisterTwister talk 05:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Renata (talk) 00:27, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails to state a claim of notability, nothing about achievements, impact or historical significance (possible in one year?). Fails Wikipedia:Notability (web). Fails WP:GNG in lacking significant coverage in independent reliable sources. --Bejnar (talk) 04:56, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.