Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centaurtopia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:16, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Only a few google hits, so appears to lack significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject as required by the notability guideline. PhilKnight (talk) 01:43, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please keep this article for two more days. I just need two day!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shortaw (talk • contribs) 01:48, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Although I saw your note regarding the mass D&D game, the article really doesn't belong on Wikipedia. I'd recommend using messageboards or a more D&D-specific wiki, or it could just be e-mailed around to the game participants. I'm sorry to say that it has no real notability outside of your group game. -Drilnoth (talk) 02:06, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per my comment above, but allow at least enough time for Shortaw to copy the material for his own use. -Drilnoth (talk) 02:06, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: This article has been added to the list of Dungeons & Dragons-related Articles for Deletion on the WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons main page. -Drilnoth (talk) 02:06, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I just copied the material from this most recent edit by Shortaw to User:Shortaw/Centaurtopia. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 03:48, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to some D&D or RPG Wikia. No notable for common RPG players. No third party sources: self promotion article? Zero Kitsune (talk) 03:04, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (or transwiki); I would suggest trimming and merging into a parent article, but this article is entirely orphaned so I don't even know what the parent article would be. —Politizer talk/contribs 03:24, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- No importance or notability outside the 150 D&D enthusiasts who are going to use this stuff for their game. Wikipedia is not a web host. Reyk YO! 05:44, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Would be better placed on a D&D wiki, not Wikipedia. Matt (Talk) 09:19, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Wikipedia is not a web host. It doesn't matter whether the article is 'needed' until tomorrow, next week, or next year. AlexTiefling (talk) 12:54, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for lacking independent references to demonstrate notability. Wikipedia isn't for stuff that you and you friend(s) have made up and, as point out, isn't a web host. --Craw-daddy | T | 16:11, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No notability. As has been said, WP not a web host and not for made up stuff. --skew-t (talk) 05:02, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, especially because this edit removed the context. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 03:42, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete. No idea what this is, as I have never heard of a thing in the article in 2 decades of D&D of how it relates to it. No sources, citations, etc. Seems like a fan creation with zero notability if it really is in any way related to D&D, at least. Certainly fails verifiablility. shadzar-talk 04:40, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.