Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caughlin Fire
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Reno, Nevada#Environmental factors. And delete. Sandstein 23:06, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Caughlin Fire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As per WP:NOT#NEWS. While the event appears to be newsworthy there is nothing to indicate it is of lasting notability. The only source supplied is the results of a Google search about the area some of which mention the fire, but again, nothing to indicate the lasting notability of the fire. SQGibbon (talk) 21:26, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOTNEWSPAPER, WP:EFFECT. I found one more source,[1] but that doesn't make it notable. -- Trevj (talk) 09:48, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 21:53, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fire with one fatality. These happen many times around the word. delete per above. SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 00:05, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Reno, Nevada#Environmental factors, where I've now added a few brief lines about wildfires in Reno, including the two major fires in Nov and Jan. Fences&Windows 14:12, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. Redirect as per User:Fences makes sense now that the same info is there. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 15:26, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.