Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cattle coding
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ffm 12:48, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Cattle coding (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non notable or made up term, no google hits or sources Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Interestingly, it's used as the opposite of cowboy coding - and there are quite a lot of sources for that term. But this one seems to be made up. DS (talk) 00:09, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This term is used in other countries (in different languages), see snitko's comment:
http://www.robertnyman.com/2008/04/04/favorite-terms-about-web-developers/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.174.112.68 (talk) 00:28, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Yup. Not notable, no strong pull against deletion. Could we possibly transwiki to wiktionary? —Sunday Note 12:15, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -Remove reference to it from Cowboy Coding and delete IMHO, unless google searches etc. yield that the term is in standard use. Sounds like it should be, but it isn't :D --90.212.22.241 (talk) 14:31, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This term should appear on google, but it doesn't, with the first page entries usually being obscure entries about bovine DNA. JASpencer (talk) 17:54, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.