Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castle Wars chess

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW MBisanz ^talk 04:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Castle Wars chess

Nominated for deletion, unreferenced, not notable, and aparantly was deleted once before. Bubba73 (talk), 04:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apparantly PRODed and deleted in Dec 2007, according to creator's talk page. Bubba73 (talk), 05:01, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can find a couple of mentions on various chess variant websites, but none even close to the rules stated here. Then there is the fact that it is unsourced. Wperdue (talk) 04:42, 13 March 2009 (UTC)wperdue[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:12, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, without sources and per Wperdue, this seems to fall under WP:MADEUP. -Lilac Soul ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 13:45, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unsourced and unsourcable WP:MADEUP chess variant. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unsourced, appears to fail verifiability requirements. Rules do not appear to have been published anywhere before they came on Wikipedia. Kind of reminded by a joke "question" Andy Soltis got in his column in June 1997 where someone proposed introducing the new piece "Super Centurion" which moves four squares in any direction except on Thursdays. Sjakkalle (Check!) 15:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFT (not to mention that it was deleted in December 2007). DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 16:41, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is a web page for submitting your nifty new chess variant: ChessVariants.org Indeed, CV.org makes it easy to submit your chess variant there. Just to clarify (talk) 19:53, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unsourced and probably made-up. SyG (talk) 07:26, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.