Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casio AW-49
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Already done by someone else Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:25, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
- Casio AW-49 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable. Doesn't merit to have article. just specifications of product Sulaimandaud (talk) 06:48, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:28, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete (or merge, though I'm not sure where). Doesn't meet WP:GNG, and I can't find any reliable independent sources for this. --Hirsutism (talk) 20:19, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as unambiguous advertising. I requested a speedy deletion; let's see if it takes. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:15, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.