Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carzone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:37, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Carzone

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet any of the three criteria at WP:WEB. All results related to Carzone talk about different organizations/websites. Aditya Ex Machina 08:22, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does not meet either WP:WEB nor WP:CORP. No reliable sources provided, and I was unable to find any independent of the organization. かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 08:28, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Comment~~ Keep per WP general notability guidelines, described in depth by multiple, independent, reliable sources. It's the subject of 2 articles in The Sunday Business Post: "Carzone.ie now more popular than Facebook" [1], "Guardian Media Group drives €5m takeover of Carzone motor website" [2]. Some 2008 statistics published here [3]. Here's the start of a pay-to-view article about it in The Irish Times: [4]. Its 2005 acquisition needed approval by the Competition Authority (Ireland) [5]. Novickas (talk) 15:44, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.