Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cartoon Network: Hall of Fame Collection

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:49, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cartoon Network: Hall of Fame Collection

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, this article has no citations. JJ98 (Talk) 21:16, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ClapBoy380's last article about Cartoon Network was speedily deleted as a hoax, and I suspect this is the same thing as it has been cut down majorly as the editor suspects we're on to him. Nate • (chatter) 05:00, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The pared-down version showing only three titles in the DVD series (beginning with Johnny Bravo) appears to be valid. Versions deeper in history are demonstrably hoax content. No comment on whether the branded series of DVDs is notable. Potential sources look thin, but I'm way out of my usual element sourcing this sort of topic. Serpent's Choice (talk) 18:34, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, based on my opinion, three DVD titles which are originally produced by Warner Home Video, not Hanna-Barbera and Stretch Films. Shows that were originally made by Hanna-Barbera productions like Johnny Bravo and Dexter's Laboratory, and Non Hanna-Barbera productions like Courage the Cowardly Dog, is seem to be notable. JJ98 (Talk) 22:38, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JJ98 (Talk) 10:52, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable, and note useful. --Nuujinn (talk) 19:28, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Exists, but isn't notable at all. The shows are, but this collection very much isn't. Sven Manguard _Talk 04:42, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.