Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Plumb (3rd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:10, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Caroline Plumb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Insufficient sources to show notability. Salimfadhley (talk) 21:20, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:40, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:41, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: OBE (not just MBE), Who's Who entry, multiple sources, UK Business Ambassador... notable. PamD 11:07, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: added UK Who's Who ref Piecesofuk (talk) 11:13, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Very notable significant coverage by government officials and media Juju (talk) 23:50, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Strong coverage, The Telegraph, Guardian, Times, Radio 4, BBC and so on. There is plenty of sources. Reuters, Hansard and so on. The References look a bit scrappy, hence the Afd probably, but they are rock solid. scope_creepTalk 11:21, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment - We require significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Could you kindly pick the top THREE sources which meet this requirement. I will happily withdraw this AfD if we can show that coverage exists and that this subject is notable. --Salimfadhley (talk) 13:34, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- Some examples: Haymarket Media Group, The Telegraph, Wired, The Gazette... --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 10:12, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- Also, from WP:ANYBIO: "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times." Receiving the Order of the British Empire clearly meets that criteria. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 10:16, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment - We require significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Could you kindly pick the top THREE sources which meet this requirement. I will happily withdraw this AfD if we can show that coverage exists and that this subject is notable. --Salimfadhley (talk) 13:34, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep There is enough coverage by multiple reliable sources to meet WP:GNG. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 09:55, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The subject clearly meets WP:GNG and has been covered in sources like The Guardian and BBC. Abishe (talk) 03:52, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.