Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carmun.com
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Wizardman 19:05, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:WEB Has a few links but ones dead, the others seem to be self published or merely trivial coverage or mentions. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered. which is clearly noted in the notability guidelines. Advert.Hu12 17:54, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:50, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per my nom--Hu12 (talk) 04:08, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Somewhat tentative keep. I have added a couple of extra references on the page. It is true that a lot of the google hits are to blogs or related non WP:RS, but there are a significant number of college and university student publications that have articles about it. Many more than the two I have included. I am inclined, in spite of my mild-deletionist tendencies, to think that if there are a significant number of secondary sources that are run by the people who are the intended users of the web site, it probably is notable, even though the secondary sources are not exactly high class. Happy to read other's opinions though. Anarchia (talk) 05:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 16:57, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. ghits establish notability. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 18:00, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, notability is established by the references provided in the article. Everyking (talk) 08:01, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Articles establish notability. --NickPenguin(contribs) 17:19, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.