Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Car Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wifione ^Message 12:34, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Car Singh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable minor business. Sources, but not substantial ones. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:44, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - The fact that it was explicitly praised by the Economic Times of India news-magazine seems notable enough. That and there are other sources, although some may be press-release-type stuff. That it's small doesn't necessarily mean that it's not notable. The article also appears to be written well, maybe too much like an advertisement but that can be fixed in later edits. 72.47.0.74 (talk) 09:27, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Would that be the long Times article on many sites that listed their phonenumber and nothing else?[1] or the article on group buying that described an initial offer for 10 people that was eventually subscribed by 28 as being "a big bulk order"?[2] Neither of these are substantial coverage of a substantial topic. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:13, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 12:27, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:44, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:51, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Although the article contains several sources, they all appear to be mentioning the same thing, the Seeders Venture Capital funding. Google News found additional results here (repeats the same content from pluggd.in) and here (cites the pluggd.in link as their reference). Considering the company was founded nearly three years ago, it's probably too soon though the other possibility is that additional sources for other achievements aren't English. SwisterTwister talk 02:51, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
delete Not a notable company. --Shorthate (talk) 00:22, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to a lack of WP:RS. Most available information is trivial or press release-style material. --Kinu ^t/_c 00:23, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.