Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captain Howdy
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep as disambig page. No really valid deletion rationale, no delete votes standing (non-admin closure) Pgallert (talk) 16:46, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Captain Howdy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is wp:or (and occasionally written in first person point-of-view) about what one character uses to describe a demonic presence in The Exorcist and article contains lines such as "it is suggested", "We also learn", "we find out", etc. Article then goes on to describe "other Captain Howdys" that do not relate to the article subject.
Article was suggested as a merge into Pazuzu (The Exorcist) but has been stale since 2008, and there is little or no encyclopedic information that could be merged. Sottolacqua (talk) 18:09, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I turned the page into a disambiguation page. If that's not the prefered outcome of this AfD, feel free to revert. – sgeureka t•c 08:28, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as dab page and merge any relevant/desirec info from the page history to Pazuzu (The Exorcist). Most of that was "in popular culture", which may indicate notability of the term, but I feel this "character" is best presented in the [[Pazuzu (The Exorcist)] article. – sgeureka t•c 08:28, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Your change looks good to me. Do we need an administrator to close this debate? Sottolacqua (talk) 20:35, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as dab per Sgeureka. ThemFromSpace 03:48, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Disambiguation per Sgeureka. Looks like this has already been done. Shooterwalker (talk) 15:52, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.