Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canyon Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus that NGEO, as the appropriate notability guidelines, is satisfied (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 01:51, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Canyon Group

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete There seems to be little or no information about this geologic group in Texas. There is only one source in this article. It also fails WP:NCORP. Evil Idiot (talk) 21:24, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 March 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:44, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:18, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this nomination is based on a misunderstanding. WP:NCORP does not apply as this isn’t a corporate group it’s a geological structure. Sources here here and [1]. Mccapra (talk) 22:27, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets the relevant notability guideline WP:NGEO, per sources found by Mccapra. RebeccaGreen (talk) 10:14, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets WP:NGEO, numerous sources available that define this, in addition to those above here are a couple more: Depositional systems in the Pennsylvanian Canyon Group of North-Central Texas, and from Lexicon of Geologic Names of the United States for 1936-1960, Part 1. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:02, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:05, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep on the basis of reliable sources found. Mccapra (talk) 07:20, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.