Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cancerslug (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:03, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cancerslug

The article in question appears to have a hint of notability, yet it contains no references to third party sources, and almost all of the sources used are blogs, which violates our reliable source policy. — Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 02:25, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I restored it per an anon request on my talk page, knowing this probably wouldn't survive another AfD without third-party references. I'm not against it staying per se, but without those refs outside of Myspace and Facebook, I have to go with delete. They seem to have some regional notability, but most of it seems like the "fanboy" type. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:48, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- J^mundo 03:03, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I see no indication of reliable sources to establish sufficient notability per WP:BAND. Vicenarian (talk) 20:20, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry man, but there's no notability. Delete. Good luck out there. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 15:29, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no coverage in reliable sources -- Whpq (talk) 19:51, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as above --Freikorp (talk) 14:51, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lacks coverage from reliable sources. Fails WP:NM. — Σ xplicit 06:32, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.