Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calendars.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:32, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Calendars.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Passes A7 for "having the largest inventory" (presumably of calendars). Google returns nothing substantial, and the one source used in the article, internetretailer.com, states on its listing, "If you would like to be considered for inclusion, please contact the Top 500 research team." Delete. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 20:22, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No evidence of notability. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 20:34, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The reference in the article doesn't demonstrate notability per WP:CORP, and a Google search doesn't seem to turn up any coverage in reliable sources that would indicate notability either. I acknowledge that this is a tricky company to Google, and if someone can find appropriate sources, I'd be happy to reconsider. P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 23:08, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ArcAngel (talk) ) 18:12, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.