Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calafrio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Stroke 9 as a standard WP:ATD for albums. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:32, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Calafrio

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an album that does not meet GNG or WP:NALBUMS due to a lack of significant coverage in RS; it also doesn't meet any other subject-specific criteria. I recommend it be merged or redirected to the band's article. Citrivescence (talk) 00:22, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:23, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:24, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Stroke 9. I had already redirected this a couple of months ago, but the article creator reverted it. I left a message on the editor's talk page stating that I would wait a while and see if any reviews appeared, as the album had only just been released. However, nothing in the way of reliable sources has turned up, so I think redirecting again is the only option. Richard3120 (talk) 14:13, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:18, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The album review from Top 40 Charts and album details from Antimusic are reliable sources and make the article good enough to pass WP:NALBUM. I rest my case. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 07:57, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Superastig: This is yet another AfD where you have voted without seemingly checking the sources or familiarising yourself with WP:NALBUM. Apart from top40-charts.com being listed as a website to avoid at WP:BADCHARTS, if you actually bothered looking at the source, you would see that it's not a review at all, it's a press release provided by the record company. Anti- Music is the band's record company. Medium is also considered unreliable, and in any case the source is simply the band posting a link to the video for their song. So there are no independent sources at all in the article. Richard3120 (talk) 14:33, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:50, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.