Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calabasas Fire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:09, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Calabasas Fire

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about a small, non-notable fire that was under 1,000 acres and received only local coverage. Per WP:WILDFIRE-GUIDE, fires over 1,000 acres are notable. This one is not. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:38, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:00, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:00, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:00, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While sourced, this is a single moment in time as indicated by the datelines. LavaBaron (talk) 20:21, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:48, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not news. There are wildfires every year. Nothing about this one is unique or covered more than the others. WP:NOTNEWS--Savonneux (talk) 04:42, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.