Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caerlon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 18:41, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Caerlon

Delete - no indication that this is a notable game. Contested prod. ... discospinster _talk 01:16, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: It doesn't say why it is notable, plus the references really only show that this game exists. Craig Montgomery (talk) 02:39, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No coverage in independent sources, etc. The usual grounds for unestablished notability. RayAYang (talk) 05:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no evidence of notability. JJL (talk) 05:37, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Even if the sites which are listed as "references" are notable, the referencing is done improperly. Fails WP:N. tj9991 (talk | contribs) 07:08, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No inline or independant references to suggest notability. Also, if you look at the creator (User:Caerlon) I think this may also be a conflict of interest. —Atyndall ^{[citation needed]} 08:17, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The user is nowhere found in the article's history, so there is no direct COI. MuZemike (talk) 19:26, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 12:25, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Seems to be written like a WP:ADVERT; also no references cited to verify the article's notability. MuZemike (talk) 19:26, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.