Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cacticalia
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete by User:FreeRangeFrog as WP:G3, blatant hoax. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 02:15, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- Cacticalia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Probable WP:HOAX. Unreferenced article with no Google hits for "Cacticalia" and a few unrelated for "Cacticals". The plant in the infobox is an Echinopsis mamillosa and not a cactus animal thingy. jonkerz ♠talk 05:59, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as hoax per nominator. Gems like "New scientific evidence suggests that Cacticals may actually share a common ancestor with both plants and animals" suggest that this is someone's bad idea of a joke. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:28, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete You have an image in the infobox, and then you have something that reads like there have been no fossils found look like a hoax for now. Zince34' 08:08, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as blatant hoax. "In particularly dire scenarios, cacticals can eat themselves to maintain their daily fiber requirements" my aunt Jemima.TheLongTone (talk) 12:50, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete – Hoax, anyone? Epicgenius (talk) 13:09, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:09, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:09, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete – Hoax Many outlandish claims with no references. --Jersey92 (talk) 20:49, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Is it blatant enough for a
{{Db-hoax}}
? --Redrose64 (talk) 22:05, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.