Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CWG Magazine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 22:06, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- CWG Magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Original PROD nomination rationale was, "No evidence of notability". SchuminWeb (Talk) 14:15, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:37, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:37, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this website. Joe Chill (talk) 18:15, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - lack of significant coverage as per Joe Chill Codf1977 (talk) 20:34, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.