Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CTGP-R

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Let me know if anyone wants to work on this as a draft. Mojo Hand (talk) 13:48, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CTGP-R

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable stub about an unofficial game mod that lacks sufficient coverage or depth. Contested WP:PROD. Current secondary sourcing is one reasonably in-depth TheGamer article about the subject, and a trivial mention in a WaPo article. A quick search yields little other than a brief mention in a Cracked article here: [1] All in all, this isn't exactly the pedigree or depth of coverage for a video game article. (Note: I'm not sure who decided to NPP tag what feels like every single possible tag on the page, but that wasn't me. The 'sources exist' tag is not accompanied by any suggested sources in-article or on the talk page.) ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 06:52, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 06:52, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Whether it's unofficial has no bearing in notability since we are not Nintendo, but it doesn't seem to have reached a decent threshold of significant coverage. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:23, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for pointing that out - I agree I should probably go for concision and avoid coloring the rationale with a description of the title as it emphasises things that aren't relevant to notability, like that it's an unofficial game mod. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 10:39, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can only find the Washington Post and Cracked articles used for sourcing, WP isn't entirely about this mod, Cracked doesn't seem to be a RS/unclear reliability. I don't find anything else for sourcing, so it's a delete. Oaktree b (talk) 13:55, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of straight up deleting it, we should just Draftify it instead. TzarN64 (talk) 15:42, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: If this content can't have it's own article, it should at the very least be put back into the article for Mario Kart Wii, with this article becoming a redirect to that section. TotallynotWario (talk) 17:06, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The article does not have enough sources to be a stand-alone page. Roberth Martinez (talk) 21:42, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.