Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CST32 Theory (Currency Space and Time)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:19, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- CST32 Theory (Currency Space and Time) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Completely original research. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:01, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete is there a speedy criteria for this? This is just unacceptable, whatever it is. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 04:39, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Original research. A Google search of the Web for "CST32 Theory" found Wikipedia only. Google Scholar and Google Books searches found nothing. -- JTSchreiber (talk) 06:02, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete looks like a personal essay. 65.93.12.65 (talk) 06:04, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Personal essay about a non-notable topic...and written in the first person (with question marks, even). Looks like it's a white Christmas after all. Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:34, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOTESSAY, and, apparently, WP:SNOW. Ezhuks (talk) 20:52, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete I see snow outside. Whose Your Guy (talk) 21:10, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.