Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CRIP Methodology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 01:00, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CRIP Methodology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find multiple substantial RS coverage of this; others are welcome to try. Zero refs. Tagged for over 3 years for notability and lack of refs. Epeefleche (talk) 21:18, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non notable (I didn't see any sources on Google) dic def. Of the three sentences, one is an outright restatement, another is composed of totally unsupported claims about retrofitting, and the first is pretty much meaningless as far as I can tell. OSborn^arf_contribs. 02:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as patent nonsense. Article is a meaningless string of glittering generalities. Whatever else can be said, nobody can be expected to make any sense out of this: The CRIP (Content, Relationships, Information, and Process) methodology for system architecture is defined as building enterprise solutions with a dynamic componentized architecture. It defines enterprise applications as being made up of Content, Relationships, Information, and Process. This allows for users to be able to retrofit solutions around their business needs without being reliant on information technology. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:13, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.