Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CMS-Helmets
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. –Juliancolton | Talk 16:10, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- CMS-Helmets (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Tagged as an orphan since April 2008 and still no articles link to it. Poorly writtend and unsourced despite claim to be brand leader. Biker Biker (talk) 09:15, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The CMS-Helmets are a subject of many reviews at specialized moto web sites. CMS-Helmets is not the world's leading brand, but it seems to be a well known company in the motorcycle world and surely deserves an article here - it may be useful for our readers. I've added external links, check it, please. --Vejvančický (talk) 10:29, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I trimmed a couple of your links, but thanks for adding the others. The article itself is badly written and contains little or no information. For the article to be kept it needs to be expanded, possibly using information from third party sources such as the reviews you posted. --Biker Biker (talk) 10:34, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for cooperation, Biker. Btw, the brevity of the content is not reason for deletion - we call those articles stubs. Notability is an important topic for us. And the CMS-Helmets meets the criteria, in my opinion. --Vejvančický (talk) 11:21, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, multiple reliable sources are now present in the form of the webbikeworld.com and all-motorcycle-helmets.com links in the current version. Nyttend (talk) 12:44, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.