Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CLOAK AND DAGGER CHRONOLOGICAL READING ORDER
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:42, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- DELETE ALL THE SHOUTING! DELETE! 'sides, it's not particularly encyclopic. Swarthington (how swarthy are you?) 23:39, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete RobJ1981 23:07, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, looks like one person's opinion on the order in which a group of comic books should be read; in other words, original research. NawlinWiki 23:53, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete please. Even if this list is the official reading order or some such, for Wikipedia's purpose, it's listcruft -Markeer 01:29, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- SPEEDY DELETE, no content or context (CSD-A3). Not an encyclopedia article or encyclopedic list. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 03:11, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the following:
- Written in all caps
- Pointless, speculative list violating WP:V and WP:OR
- "Chronography" isn't even the right word. --Wafulz 03:43, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per db-nonsense. Leuko 03:54, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per everything above. ---Chris Griswold(☏) 04:09, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Nuttah68 19:47, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.