Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CDisplayEx (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural close. The page was a redirect that was blanked by an IP. The correct procedure is to restore the redirect and take it to RFD if the redirect should be deleted.. -- GB fan 16:08, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CDisplayEx

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This user blanked it, so I'm deleting it. Eric S.V. (talk) 12:09, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, it is a minor program that seems to be bundled with malware and the section that the redirect was referencing has been removed. --Frmorrison (talk) 14:30, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural question: there doesn't appear to be any article content, or any meaningful history. Is there a target where this article could be uncontroversially redirected? Otherwise I think it could be speedied under WP:A3 since it has no content. Safehaven86 (talk) 15:49, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.