Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CARE's Response to Avian and Pandemic Flu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. JERRY ^talk _contribs 19:42, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CARE's Response to Avian and Pandemic Flu

Prod removed without explanation. This article is basically an essay assessing the response of an organization to Avian and Pandemic Flu. All references are to primary sources, suggesting original research. In any case, fails WP:SOAP and probably WP:NOT#OR. Redfarmer (talk) 00:54, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (or merge to CARE (relief))--no evidence of individual notability for CARE's response to this situation. JJL (talk) 01:00, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect to CARE (relief). --Hyperbole (talk) 01:02, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The title doesn't describe the article very well. There's not evidence that the subject is notable. I also agree with WP:SOAP and WP:NOR failures. --JJLatWiki (talk) 01:09, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- this topic does not deserve its own encyclopedic article. The whole thing just smacks too much of promotion (everything under the "Projects" section is just an ad). -- Ekjon Lok (talk) 23:49, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge -- individual aid organizations responses to individual crisises is not worthy of its own article -- merge to the aid organization's article, the crisis's article, or delete entirely. --SJK (talk) 08:59, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.