Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C0c0n
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:50, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- C0c0n (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of significant coverage or other indicia of notability that I can find for this conference. Glenfarclas (talk) 04:06, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Actually there is an article on the conference in Hindu here Not sure though if it satisfies WP:EVENT. --Nayvik (talk) 16:15, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – Lacks significant coverage. ttonyb (talk) 16:22, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:43, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:44, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not enough coverage (except the small article in The Hindu) in secondary sources. Probably there is more in Malayalam sources (will change my vote if those are added)--Sodabottle (talk) 06:21, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment:updating the informations.(talk) 17:08, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Insulting people won't get you anywhere. What we need to satisfy wikipedia's notability guidelines is indepth coverage in newspapers, TV, magazines etc. At present there is small 3 para "it happened" coverage in The Hindu that meets the criteria and it is not enough for wikipedia standards. Find coverage in other reliable sources (not coverage in minor websites, blogs and the organisation's own website) and the article will be kept. --Sodabottle (talk) 18:32, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.