Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bunny with a pancake on its head

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Oolong (rabbit). Redirect is generally preferred over deletion and as it stood had no chance in hell of ever being Kept. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:33, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bunny with a pancake on its head

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability. Sammy1339 (talk) 18:12, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete under WP:A7. Also fails WP:GNG and WP:NEO, for what it's worth. APerson (talk!) 18:14, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. APerson (talk!) 18:15, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Oolong (rabbit) as it was before. Elizium23 (talk) 18:33, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as duplicate of Oolong (rabbit); or redirect —Мандичка^YO 😜 18:37, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - SNUGGUMS, what is the point of re-opening this AfD? It was a non-controversial redirect and an admin already redirected it. Obviously I thought I was being helpful in closing it because Just Chilling possibly forgot; you could have just reminded me of the rule I forgot about. Instead you've gone and reverted the redirect and re-applied the speedy delete template so some other admin has to do extra work! And all for possibly the STUPIDEST article of all time: Bunny with a pancake on its head. Is this really the best use of your time? —Мандичка^YO 😜 00:06, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your closure per WP:CLOSEAFD; an uninvolved user needs to close this AFD. Be patient; another user will close this within a reasonable amount of time. Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:09, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I declined a speedy delete on this, because it is possibly useful as a redirect--as even the user who asked for the speedy indicates. DGG ( talk ) 00:21, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.