Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bumpr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:22, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bumpr

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

And delete User:Ghost1227? I was asked to histmerge Bumpr into User:Ghost1227, but they have WP:Parallel versions, and they both look like "non-notable website". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:15, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:WEB, website "currently in internal alpha" = not notable. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:15, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per site not being in alpha any longer. That takes care of your complaint, right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.215.220.19 (talk) 01:00, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment that was me. I wanted to have the userpage deleted and merged into the article because it looked like that that was where the article had came from. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 17:30, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:WEB. For crying out loud, the site only entered beta 5 days ago. Ray^Talk 04:50, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.