Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bump mapping (sixth generation consoles)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:59, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Bump mapping (sixth generation consoles) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Mixture of original research and nonsense. VasileGaburici (talk) 05:07, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Based on the title this article claims to be about bump mapping implementation techniques in "sixth generation consoles". What this article actually contains (by section):
- "What are they": a catalog of bump mapping theoretical concepts, covered in detail elsewhere.
- "Implementing":
- a few hardware details about various game consoles, probably covered elsewhere (didn't check all).
- An unsourced speculative analysis that attempts to determine how well-suited are the various consoles to implement bump mapping. This seems original research.
- "Issues with use on PS2/GC":
- An original research analysis that details how well bump mapping looks in various PS2/GC games, and attempts to guess what bump mapping techinique was used in each game.
Bottom line: this article engages in speculation, lacks any technical depth, and when read start to end, doesn't make any sense. VasileGaburici (talk) 05:38, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per VasileGaburici. Rilak (talk) 07:10, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MuZemike (talk) 07:16, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Ouch, that's the essence of original research. Equendil Talk 08:59, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- what's useful is elsewhere, and what's original isn't very good. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 14:29, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Some of the information can be added to bump mapping and then the article can be deleted.--SkyWalker (talk) 18:30, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — Original research does not pay; you cannot make non-trivial assumptions or inferences from sources. MuZemike (talk) 21:06, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.