Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bully and the Beast

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Orson Scott Card bibliography. Overall consensus is to redirect so no point dragging this on (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:50, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bully and the Beast

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NBOOK, non-existant book which has been proposed for many years but never published. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:11, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:01, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:02, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Orson Scott Card bibliography. The Bully and the Beast article is almost entirely boilerplate; the only fact that it has that the bibliography article doesn't already have is "based on the short story 'The Bully and the Beast'". That single fact doesn't warrant an article of its own, so add it to the "notes" line item in Orson Scott Card bibliography. -- Finlay McWalterᚠTalk 11:32, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Finlay McWalter's concerns. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 23:59, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.