Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulbasaur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by Nominator, defaulting to keep, non-admin closure. TonyBallioni 23:01, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bulbasaur

I'm ending the too-long-lasting discussion once and for all. This discussion has been active for far too long. Once this discussion is over, everything that's not part of the final results, should be reverted. Agreed? TheBlazikenMaster 22:28, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My vote is merge to the list like it's supposed to. TheBlazikenMaster 22:28, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of the most notable and reconizable Pokemon characters, more than notable enough for its own article (hell, it was even a FA on the front page). TJ Spyke 22:40, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think TheBlazikenMaster is nominating the whole list of Pokemon. If so, I don't think that discussion belongs in AFD. Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 22:48, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm clearly nominationg one article. TheBlazikenMaster 22:53, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I missed the actual discussion part. I think this should be Snowball Closed because it doesn't meet the standards for AFD and is not what AFD is for.Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 22:57, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I was just trying to improve this per the suggestions left by AManInBlack. I do not understand the rationale behind the nomination but obviously, having tried to improve it, would prefer the article to be kept for further improvement. btw I hadn't read the thing about threading posts and was trying to keep a track there: the indented dones are me, sorry.--Barnyard animals 22:54, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw TTN is right, so I'm withdrawing it. TheBlazikenMaster 22:56, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.