Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Parrett
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:59, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Brian Parrett (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Only claim to notability is that he was an unsuccessful candidate in an election. Fails WP:BIO. Blueboy96 15:35, 30 September 2007 (UTC)I[reply]
- Delete: Losing one house election doesn't make a person notable. WP:BIO. Iamchrisryan 16:30, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I vote delete for NN and failing WP:BIO. --Sc straker 22:51, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn Jonathan t - c 23:19, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The odd thing is, he's actually got another string to his bow that wasn't mentioned; he's a director of "Hemp Advocates of Texas", which doesn't lend him sufficient notability according to the Ghits (nothing independent, just blogs, self-advertisement and the like). But the Austin Chronicle called him part of a "weak field" of opposition and I have to agree. Perhaps he'll be notable in the future but not quite yet. Accounting4Taste 00:43, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable, at this time. • Lawrence Cohen 13:31, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.