Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Break technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 00:23, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Break technologies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NEOLOGISM, posted by an editor using what appears to be his own blog entry as sole reference. Ghits for '"break technologie" Wessel' (last name of originator of term) look to be all syndication or linking to same article, or utterly unrelated to this usage. Fails WP:NOTABILITY, appears to be WP:PROMO. Nat Gertler (talk) 22:25, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination and redirect to sledgehammer, which has always done the job for me. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:29, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as neologism. If it becomes widely used, someone with no COI will write about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:19, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.