Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brajesh Tiwari (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 21:54, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Brajesh Tiwari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'll repeat what User:Alexandermcnabb said in the first AFD: Perfectly normal academic, co-authoring, publishing papers and so on. Article sourced to primary sources (papers etc), University website. Despite impressive looking reference section, subject presents no evidence of notability, no media coverage, no evidence of enduring academic impact. Strange mixture, in fact, of food processing and banking. WP:NOTCV very much applies here, and so does failing WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 16:42, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:spa|username}} ; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}} . |
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Authors. UtherSRG (talk) 16:42, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:01, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. I was unable to find citations or book reviews that might justify WP:PROF#C1 or WP:AUTHOR notability. Nothing in the article looks like anything that might lead to any other form of notability. And this article has been plagued by repeated listings of publications by unrelated people with similar names. (That's what the "strange mixture" was about: the food processing Tiwari is someone else named Brijesh not Brajesh.) —David Eppstein (talk) 02:42, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No coverage found. Fails WP:NPROF, WP:SIGCOV. scope_creepTalk 04:07, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The food processing stuff was in the article. Still a mess, still not WP:GNG. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:20, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep He is notable as an author and academician. Having notable publications to his credit. ABDB1 (talk) 12:38, 4 December 2022 (UTC) — ABDB1 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Delete Merely having written things is not enough to establish wiki-notability by any standard. XOR'easter (talk) 17:06, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️Let's Talk ! 17:19, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Enough Links and references for notability, mostly single authorship publication. Several Media Links are there. His Research work cited by world Bank. 01234boy (talk) 18:04, 4 December 2022 (UTC) — 01234boy (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.