Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boltblue

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 05:53, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boltblue

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. References are either dead links, brief mentions or announcements, not about the company, or from unreliable sources. The references that I do find fall short of WP:CORPDEPTH. CNMall41 (talk) 19:52, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as clear advertising sourced by only PR announcements and mentions, with policy violations in that alone. SwisterTwister talk 00:22, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete since the company has been around for long enough and there might be a wide quantity of coverage, but the article is now so promotional in tone do not see anything worth saving. W Nowicki (talk) 23:55, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:47, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:19, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:20, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.