Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blurred Lines
 | This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus. Redirecting to blurry vision would likely be a better target. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:33, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
| This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
- Blurred Lines (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Lines Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Hopeless WP:COPYVIO. --AmaryllisGardener talk 03:47, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect to Word Crimes. That's a far better song. Supernerd11 Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 04:10, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- Agreed. Origamiteⓣⓒ 04:18, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Injunct [1] clearly the selling of wikipedia pageviews is injuncted -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 06:13, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.